Game #217 Comments

|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
The games do seem to be getting a little harder. The 1's were the only numbers I could find that you can completely fill in. After the 1's, I filled mostly the right column of small squares and then the rest by numbers again.
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
Well done Vivien. How low can you go.
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
Hi Fizzbut, I'm getting tired, but don't you give up now!!! Keep up the good work!! I can't explain how I did this - a mishmash numbers here and there.
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
Maybe when FReDD comes on he'll be able to figure out a clearer order.
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
Yes: we miss your organized mind FReDD!!
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
Hi Fizzbut if you're still there - go for the extra few seconds I'm signing off for the night!!
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
Thanks, guys, I feel very proud and touched by your comments, but I think you overestimate me. I'm not in your league at all, and even if I like to find paths and filling orders, this one was clearly too complex for me.
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
... Anyway, here's what I found for this one. This sorry excuse of a path is the best I found. I feel embarrassed to give it, but oh well :
As fizzbut already noted, only the 1s can be completely filled. So you have to resort to fill rows, or cols, or 3x3 squares in order to retrieve a filling path later.
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
I filled the 1s, then the 3rd row, 2nd row, then 3x3 middle right square, then the 7th col. After that, I could do : 3 7 6* 2 9 4 6 5 8
* incomplete
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
FReDD- don't underestimate yourself (or overestimate us). We knew you'd make what sense there is to make out of this one. Which to me makes it a good puzzle. But 1:07. I'm to compusive to stop there, I'd have to get it under 1:00. So either it's talent or I need counseling.
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
Oh and Adam, Puzzles are getting better. Great job.
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
> But 1:07. I'm to compusive to stop there, I'd have to get it under 1:00.
I just can't. In 217 games, I've NEVER, ever been able to solve a puzzle under 1:00. That's what I call the "minute wall". There's a relativistic thing going on that makes me slower as time passes on. Maybe if there was only one cell to fill...
|
|
|


|
| 
|
|
| 
|

|
> So either it's talent or I need counseling.
Of course it's talent. Have you noticed that for me (and I think any of us except Vivien and 3-4 others) to rank above you, I have had to solve every friggin' puzzle on this site, whereas, if I'm not mistaken, you didn't played them all ?
|
|
|


|